MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 11:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 693
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 127GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 137 147 140 149 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 469
Write 429
Mixed 338
SusWrite 146
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 20.2
78% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 50.3
80% 142 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid WDC WD3003FZEX-0 3TB
469GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 96 94 92 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 94.7
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB
634GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 136 139 134 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 138
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.9
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback