Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 23:53
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 302
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,120
103% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,508
93% 1,508 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36DE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1578 MHz, MLim: 1945 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 119
Parallax 117
93% 117 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 105
Splatting 95.1
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 958GB
566GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 121 162 157 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 525
Write 309
Mixed 291
SusWrite 144
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 8.4
37% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 58.9
50% 73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 188%
Amd-raid Array 6 500GB
206GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 96 93 96 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 115
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 95.7
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 33.7
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 34.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback