Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DA7/E  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DA7/E
Memory249.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 09:45
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 723
65% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,802
112% 1,802 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 143
Parallax 147
127% 149 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
108% 136 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 437 438 430 415 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 458
Mixed 379
SusWrite 414
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 42.4
145% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 356
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
752GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 442 443 434 419 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 456
Mixed 423
SusWrite 424
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 43.5
148% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
1.5TB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1414 1409 1412 1412 1413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,809
Write 1,738
Mixed 1,565
SusWrite 1453
369% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 56.4
167% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 458
338% 450 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 234%
Great: 335%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB
469GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 571 569 569 568 566 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%
WD WD5001F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 165 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 132
Write 202
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 166
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
357% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 125%
WD Re 2TB-$38
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 137 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 136
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 227 227 231 232 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 64.2
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 54.6
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback