MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 494
42% 364 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 7.06
3% 9.25 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.17
6% 6.64 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 62 51 73 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 93.3
Write 87.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 67.7
49% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF MSI16D3LS1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback