Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 16:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 304
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2669
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.75
1% 1.12 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 109 110 85 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 184
Write 118
Mixed 127
SusWrite 105
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 30.7
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 35.8
34% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
122GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 58
Write 37.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 61.8
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 42%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 802GB
2TB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.7
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback