Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 213
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 757
71% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
ASRock(1849 5122) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 201
90% 134 fps
MRender 87.2
Gravity 101
Splatting 126
88% 105 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 372 376 376 373 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 388
Write 365
Mixed 320
SusWrite 371
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 30.7
111% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 193
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
321GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 428 435 263 100 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 402
Mixed 336
SusWrite 292
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 38.8
142% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 220
190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 320GB
194GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38
Mixed 24
SusWrite 39.6
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 29.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback