Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130516
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 5 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 356 45% 343 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.3% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 27.8 22% 26.5 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 33.1 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 239 257 253 252 237 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 357 Write 296 Mixed 249 SusWrite 240 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 31.3 110% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 40.3 38% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 118%
Samsung 750 EVO 500G 500GB 706 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 227GB free Firmware: 0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 118 117 119 119 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 366 Write 316 Mixed 294 SusWrite 116 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 24.5 84% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 56.1 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 48.6 37% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 413GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 112 114 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 111 Write 40.5 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 112 62% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 342GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 98 99 100 100 99 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 109 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 97.6 69% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 298GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 67 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 62.7 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 66.2 45% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 457GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 112 113 112 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 154 Write 135 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 110 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 226% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 110 112 113 112 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 104 Mixed 74 SusWrite 110 71% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 727GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 98 98 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 33.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 97.6 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 597GB free Firmware: 0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 118 118 120 116 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 116 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 230GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 37.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 36.9 43% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 169GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 33.7 Write 33.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 33.8 45% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 28%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 118GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 38.7 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 4.7 36% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	236x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	28x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16