Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 14:30
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 122
2-Core 201
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 325
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E148) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 8.31
8% 9.52 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 9.35
6% 7.11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 186 178 193 181 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 453
Mixed 399
SusWrite 212
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.5
191% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
628GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 188 193 192 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 143
Mixed 81
SusWrite 192
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
770GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 124 123 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 122
Write 26.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 118
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 75%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1.1
1% 1.02 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback