Acer Aspire TC-280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-280  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-280
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 113
47% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 183
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 35.8
30% 34 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 34.4
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-CC128 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GC71201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 147 127 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 378
Write 176
Mixed 213
SusWrite 138
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 28.3
99% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 151
130% 194 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
553GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 180 182 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 168
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 178
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
ADATA CH11 1TB
379GB free, PID a11a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 29 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 26
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 29.2
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-280 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback