Lenovo 20080

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20080  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '17 at 16:54
Run Duration412 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 15.2
2-Core 29.7
32% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 25.1
8-Core 27.9
4% 26.5 Pts
64-Core 27.4
2% 27.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310M
Legend(17AA 397C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.6.5000
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 73.7
Write 83
Mixed 29.3
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.009
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.05
13% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 60%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 34GB
25GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 8.05
Mixed 2.52
9% 9.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.23
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.008
12% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.6
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20080 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback