Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '20 at 09:59
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 120 58% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 386 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 34.8 21% 28.2 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 30 Splatting 25.9 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,636 Write 3,098 Mixed 3,008 723% 3,247 MB/s	4K Read 213 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 57.3 485% 146 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 431 306% 391 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 85 76 76 76 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 429 Write 405 Mixed 372 SusWrite 116 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 48.3 164% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 181 152% 221 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 118%
Maxtor 6 Y160M0 164GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 22GB free Firmware: YAR5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 35.6 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 30.1 23% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 33%
SanDisk SDSSDHII240G 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 71GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 186 214 211 206 201 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 248 Write 203 Mixed 98.7 SusWrite 196 241% 186 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 18.4 1,556% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 35.5 DQ Mixed 20.6 1,974% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 271%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 50GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 154 72 24 18 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 268 Write 253 Mixed 225 SusWrite 89.8 273% 209 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 22.6 1,703% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 36.1 DQ Mixed 27 2,234% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 289%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 58GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 28.9 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 27.3 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 64% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 37%
KINGSTON SV300S3 120GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 13GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 35 37 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 36.6 Write 36.6 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 34.9 50% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 12 980% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 11.5 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 13.3 1,087% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 148%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.5% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	866x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	111x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16