CMS 7200-5472A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5472A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 09:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 180
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 592
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.1.4
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 26.9
17% 21.7 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 21.1
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 349
Write 192
Mixed 207
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 13.7
30% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
429GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 146 148 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 146
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 146
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
25GB free, PID 6332
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 19
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 19.3
26% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.8
246% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5472A Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: CMS 7200-5472A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback