Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1240  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 05:54
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 79.8
47% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 152
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 7.35
Parallax 6.72
5% 6.88 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 7.39
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 140 125 157 113 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 418
Write 286
Mixed 295
SusWrite 154
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 23.8
90% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 53.2
59% 105 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 124%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
498GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 92 84 104 78 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 98.2
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
736GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 45 44 51 40 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 99
Write 86.1
Mixed 60
SusWrite 49.4
95% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 53%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
72GB free, PID 0570
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 18 19 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 19.2
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 39%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 6.6 7 8.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 18.5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 7.1
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 11%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 5.1 8.3 9.1 7.4 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 11.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.9
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 7%
Seagate BUP SL 4TB
919GB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 44 44 49 40 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 48
Write 83.6
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 48.3
82% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.4
128% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
353GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 44 41 49 39 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 69.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 47.3
76% 54 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 HP655410-150-HYCG 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1240 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback