TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Cisco UCSC-BASE-M2-C460

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCisco UCSC-BASE-M2-C460  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-BASE-M2-C460
Memory121.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 15:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4870
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 98.1
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 120
60% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 428
38% 319 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 68.2%
 Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 480GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 96 60 19 144 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 388
Write 102
Mixed 7
SusWrite 84.1
31% 145 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
24% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 27.2%
 Great: 72%
UNIGEN QPR2000 2GB
0GB free, PID 1a20
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 27.3
Write 10
Mixed 11.9
18% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 2.13 MB/s
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
9GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.7
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.99%
 Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965426-079.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-079.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 9965426-088.A00LF 0x0198 996542... 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 22
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 45.7
88% 45.7 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback