Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 71 2-Core 134 61% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 356 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 26 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 01F0) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.07 Reflection 11 Parallax 2.06 6% 6.7 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 12 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 164 167 168 176 168 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.1% Average	Read 168 Write 149 Mixed 160 SusWrite 166 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 30.2 88% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 59.8 DQ Mixed 38.5 31% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 129%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 1TB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 236 237 240 242 241 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 243 Write 204 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 236 139% 191 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 195%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.6% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217