Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 22:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 27
2-Core 74.2
36% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 59.7
8-Core 77.8
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 2.25
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 73 73 97 100 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 105
Write 87.5
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 86.5
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback