ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows Vista is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (4GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows Vista
BIOS Date	20081114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '15 at 16:45
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$150 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 49.7 2-Core 97.9 34% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 97.3 8-Core 94.5 13% 95.9 Pts	64-Core 97.9 6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 82AD) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.12.9573 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Lighting 5.83 Reflection 8.69 Parallax 1.94 5% 5.49 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 4.03 Splatting 6.09 5% 6.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 465GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 173 2308 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 780 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 643 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 284 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 772 (C2) HDA temperature 117 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	100% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 175 Mixed 118 116% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.34 130% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$174 2,758 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: SD35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 82967813 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4412 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 625578862 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12772 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4381 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 8590065666 (BD) vendor-specific 47 47 53 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 487915549 (C2) HDA temperature 29 45 60129542173 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 30 82967813 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4	48.7% Average	Read 84 Write 85.9 Mixed 78.2 62% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.27 62% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 66%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 222GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 30.7 Mixed 31 40% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.38 69% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 21%
USB DISK 20X 1GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.27% Terrible	Read 19 Write 16.9 Mixed 17.3 22% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.06 4K Write 0.13 4K Mixed 0.12 31% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.27% Great: 8%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-EP45-UD3P Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	33x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	12x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	4x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	4x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GBBench 88%, 2,389 samples	6x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	76x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	16x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $358

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback