QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory25GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 25GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
MotherboardQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Memory18.7 GB free of 25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '20 at 07:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 607
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.6
92% 106 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 93.4
Splatting 75.2
78% 98.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 698GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 93 101 94 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
Read 370
Write 228
Mixed 245
SusWrite 91.4
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 17.5
61% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 53.4
49% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB
195GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 130 137 137 144 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 25GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 9216 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback