Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 811
87% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 109
Parallax 109
92% 110 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 107
Splatting 80.3
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 732 531 526 533 558 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 888
Write 904
Mixed 676
SusWrite 626
174% 773 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 30.8
122% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 266
223% 320 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 411%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 37
Write 11.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 11
19% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
125% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
9GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 26
Write 7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 13.7
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.6
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 37.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback