| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | Dell Studio 1555 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0D176M |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110402 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 12 '20 at 01:22 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.8%
Average
|
40% 59.5 Pts
|
11% 81.8 Pts
|
5% 80.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Dell(1028 02BE) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
|
0.44%
Terrible
|
0% 0.49 fps
|
0% 0.52 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 218 237 245 242 233 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
27% 117 MB/s
|
35% 9.3 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate BUP Slim 500GB
458GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
17% 22.4 MB/s
|
106% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 15 MB/s
|
8.89%
Terrible
|
23% 17.3 MB/s
|
48% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio 1555 Builds (Compare 75 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio 1555
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples | 55x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 16x |
| Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 18% - Very poor | Total price: $28 |