HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory13.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 07:21
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 596
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
HP(103C 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 14.5
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EZRX-00A3KB0 1TB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 80 88 95 97 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 64.2
Write 72.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 94.2
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5474-036.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback