Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A70

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory1GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (1GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite A70  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA EDW10
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20081106
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 28 '15 at 19:20
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Mobile Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz
NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 43.1
18% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 42.3
8-Core 43.7
6% 43 Pts
64-Core 44.3
3% 44.3 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IC25N040ATMR04-0 40GB
33GB free (System drive)
Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 11
14% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.17
51% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Lexar JumpDrive P10 USB 3.0 32GB-$71
26GB free, PID a836
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 16.2
Mixed 17.3
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 1.79
136% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 90%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback