Today's hottest deals

Foxconn MCP73

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFoxconn MCP73  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN MCP73M05
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5420-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 61.4
33% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 116
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i
Device(105B 0D1D) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.12 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 86 70 77 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 95
Mixed 52
SusWrite 76.6
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP73 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Foxconn MCP73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $54
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback