Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '20 at 08:52
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core
AM4, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 618
68% 535 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic 240GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 37 4.6 9.4 107 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 356
Write 282
Mixed 240
SusWrite 55.1
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 13.8
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 39.6
42% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$57
193GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 402 402 404 403 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,343
Write 2,232
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 585
370% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 76.2
249% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 739
558% 756 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 241%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G266681 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback