Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '17 at 17:29
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 619 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 160 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 586 54% 449 Pts	64-Core 1,509 93% 1,509 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 117 Parallax 103 84% 107 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 103 Splatting 104 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3819 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1576 (B1) Unknown 98 98 82 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18714276791	88.3% Excellent	Read 497 Write 466 Mixed 475 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 30.9 103% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 82.9 86% 143 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 124%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 129GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 118GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 15.9 Mixed 17.9 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.94 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.37 50% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-057.A00 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	MC Read 55 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 33.7 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $378

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16