Acer Predator G3610

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3610
Memory	20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '20 at 22:39
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 185 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 410 47% 369 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 74.4 53% 65.8 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 54.8 Splatting 74.3 52% 62.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 105 104 105 107 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 249 Write 279 Mixed 247 SusWrite 102 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 21.4 70% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 45.8 DQ Mixed 26.4 23% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 124%
C400-MTFDDAK064MAM 64GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 59GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 104 102 103 103 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 214 Write 109 Mixed 137 SusWrite 104 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 15 74% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 16.7 21% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 863GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 81 82 82 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 60.7 Write 95 Mixed 44 SusWrite 80.3 51% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EARX-008FB0 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Read 6 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 5.8 8% 5.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M391B1G73BH0-CH9 M391B1G73BH0-CH9 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 16.1 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3610 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3610

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	194x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	64x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	27x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,166 samples	24x
NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 227 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16