Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 13:40
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 827
79% 651 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 61.1
59% 68.6 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 64.8
54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,910
Write 356
Mixed 422
192% 896 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 37.1
177% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1031
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 365
331% 529 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
524GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 452 451 452 454 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 456
Mixed 417
SusWrite 453
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 50.6
171% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 307
246% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
99GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 109
Write 98.7
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 74
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 179 182 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 155
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 180
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 150 64GB
51GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 38
Write 14.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 22.4
25% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
43% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 859B BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 859B BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 859B BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 28
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 29.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback