Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite A100  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, , 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060830
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 16:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2050
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 15.6
2-Core 29.8
26% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 28.9
8-Core 30.2
4% 29.5 Pts
64-Core 29.8
2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A360 320GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3OC71E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 84 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 90.3
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 8GB-$13
3GB free, PID a833
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 11.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 11.4
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
63% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.47% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A100 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback