Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 650 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FD
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 09:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 168
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 256
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5064
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 5.47
5% 6.62 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 12.1
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,172
Write 1456
Mixed 1,415
372% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 78.8
251% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 706
555% 784 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Jmicron Corp. 250GB
14GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 20
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 20.9
26% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHYXPX-MIE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 18.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 17.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G2 Builds (Compare 1,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback