Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 22:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 120
53% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.97
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 79 45 20 32 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 358
Write 311
Mixed 307
SusWrite 84
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 1.1
42% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
15% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ACF032 320GB-$20
76GB free
Firmware: AV001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 99 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 99
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 99.8
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 67%
Synology iSCSI Storage 86GB
21GB free
Firmware: 3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3 5.2 2.9 4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4
6% 7.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback