Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 231
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 736
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 43.8
38% 48.1 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 60.9
48% 58.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 685 569 479 729 697 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 993
Mixed 988
SusWrite 595
228% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 53.2
220% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 784
606% 833 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 202%
Great: 242%
Intel X25-M 160GB
28GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 35 18 51 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 252
Write 69
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 36.1
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 11.7
34% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 28.1
48% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 46%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
10GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 180
Mixed 193
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 23.4
98% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 106
96% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 66
SusWrite 121
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 101%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
657GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 160 160 158 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 138
Write 127
Mixed 74
SusWrite 159
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 97%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 192 198 195 193 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 205
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 194
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
263% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 131%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 2TB
454GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 44 48 56 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43% Average
Read 93.7
Write 97.3
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 55.6
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43%
Great: 80%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 2.5TB
687GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 44 48 56 65 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 57
Write 57
Mixed 60
SusWrite 55.5
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 146 158 144 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69% Good
Read 91.5
Write 110
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 148
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69%
Great: 90%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
269GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 44 48 56 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 121
Write 103
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 55.6
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 44 48 56 65 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 162
Write 154
Mixed 105
SusWrite 56.5
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 24.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback