PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170707 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '20 at 12:41 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
|
3.72%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 74 68 79 77 75 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
41GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 27 24 26 22 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
USB Mass Storage Device 16GB
14GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 35 35 34 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
Corsair Flash Voyager Vega USB 3.0 64GB-$45
50GB free, PID 1a14
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 32 38 42 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 612x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 515x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 344x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 435x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 299x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 167x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $254 |