Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 00:51
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 771
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 140
Parallax 140
120% 143 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 64.8
56% 68.8 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 59
53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 275 272 228 267 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 482
Write 446
Mixed 269
SusWrite 264
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 35.4
127% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 204
182% 276 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 106%
WD WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 (TurboPC EX) 1TB
842GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 163 154 165 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 150
Mixed 109
SusWrite 162
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 4TB
798GB free, PID 0257
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 105 111 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
196% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 106
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 109
148% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 2.7
1,735% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 28.5
DQ Mixed 3.8
1,105% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 196%
Great: 358%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-22HXZT3 500GB
260GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36
Write 29.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 33.6
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 24.1
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback