Sapphire PC-AM3RS890G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardSapphire PC-AM3RS890G  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 14:06
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 88
45% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 40.8
34% 41.2 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 34.8
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 78 38 32 32 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 451
Write 376
Mixed 314
SusWrite 70.2
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 27.8
99% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 222
164% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 114%
As25 480 GB 480GB
217GB free
Firmware: R052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 264 127 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
Read 460
Write 354
Mixed 341
SusWrite 124
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 18.5
84% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 1.1
44% 102 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
276GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 62 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 64.4
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 62.3
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
430GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 91.1
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback