Asus X550JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '20 at 09:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 197
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 521
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 178D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 7.12
3% 8.52 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.22
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 345 343 333 331 330 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 335
Write 324
Mixed 302
SusWrite 327
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 19.5
92% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 188
143% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
647GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 102 102 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 92.6
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 99.6
59% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1014 D3R4GS16B8R 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback