Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime24.6 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 13:45
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 110
2-Core 252
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 703
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 25
Parallax 7.53
6% 13.3 fps
MRender 9.19
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 15
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 364
Mixed 374
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 26.5
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 276
233% 338 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
445GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 85 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
47% Average
Read 77.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 85.3
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 79%
USB 2.0 2.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.6 8.2 7.2 8.4 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.7
8% 6.27 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback