Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime22.5 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 21:52
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 233
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 704
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
Asus(1043 85DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 114
Parallax 95.4
83% 104 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 99.5
80% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 199 130 211 183 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 199
Write 105
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 191
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 11.6
54% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 164 194 190 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 134
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 182
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 11 9.6 11 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 105%
TOSHIBA HDWA130 3TB
241GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 126 130 113 131 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 119
Write 121
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 123
129% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
ST12000V N0007-2GS116 12TB
580GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 34 29 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 162
SusWrite 31.6
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
276% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 88%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 19 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 192
SusWrite 21.5
182% 139 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 9.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 80%
ST12000N E0007-2GT116 12TB
581GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 19 22 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
Read 137
Write 137
Mixed 150
SusWrite 21.4
147% 111 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.4
228% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 54%
ST12000V N0007-2GS116 12TB
580GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 34 29 33 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 225
Write 218
Mixed 93
SusWrite 31.7
175% 142 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.4
227% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 24,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback