Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '20 at 06:50
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 167 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 145 58% 98 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 565 50% 425 Pts	64-Core 1,248 77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 178 Parallax 201 112% 172 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 181 Splatting 130 117% 144 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 140%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mtfddav480tcb-1ar1za 01KR465D7A09399LEN 480GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: MD51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 321 316 315 314 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 298 Write 305 Mixed 262 SusWrite 315 67% 295 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 29.8 121% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 248 196% 269 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 100%
MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 258% 2.5TB free Firmware: KPYAIR3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 828 871 865 887 881 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 604 Write 870 Mixed 665 SusWrite 869 171% 752 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 26.1 140% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 686 DQ Write 537 DQ Mixed 486 398% 570 MB/s
Poor: 171% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 312%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 DDR4 3000 2OZ CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 DDR4 3000 2OZ CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 DDR4 3000 2OZ CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 DDR4 3000 2OZ 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	106% Outstanding	MC Read 49.4 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 37.8 122% 42.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 16.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	469x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	109x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	48x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	85x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	43x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16