Today's hottest deals

Asus X202EP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X202EP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X202EP
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 37.2
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 24.9
20% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 24.3
8-Core 13.1
3% 18.7 Pts
64-Core 12.6
1% 12.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 774MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.28 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT23L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 95 108 96 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 362
Write 371
Mixed 273
SusWrite 115
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 17.9
66% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 81.4
61% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.9
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 216
19% 216 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X202EP Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X202EP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback