Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 08:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$49
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 214
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 407
54% 407 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 118
Parallax 119
98% 119 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 116
Splatting 95.2
101% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 188 189 185 184 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 450
Write 409
Mixed 361
SusWrite 201
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 41.6
155% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 149
120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
326GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 151 154 151 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 152
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 109%
Lexar JD FireFly 16GB
5GB free, PID a781
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.2 5.1 5.2 5 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 15
Write 4.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5
7% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-4GVR 0420 F4-2133C15-4GVR 0420 F4-2400C15-4GVR 0420 F4-2400C15-4GVR 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback