Today's hottest deals

HP xw6600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP xw6600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A9Ch
Memory7.3 GB free of 10.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081015
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 23:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5410
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 56.9
33% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 125
18% 129 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 9.27
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 4.38
8% 7.19 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 7
Splatting 5.43
6% 6.86 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 155 32 67 89 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 251
Write 233
Mixed 211
SusWrite 99.4
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 1.2
47% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 13.8
24% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 43GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback