Today's hottest deals

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.9 GB free of 15.9844 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 960 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 09:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 131
42% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 148
15% 124 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 11EB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.38
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.24 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 21GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 218
Write 61.5
Mixed 139
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 9.9
35% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 84
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 91.8
67% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 51%
Xensrc PVDISK 107GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 782
Mixed 194
360% 488 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 10.5
2,432% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 25.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback