Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$78
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 462
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Palit(1569 0FC1) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 9.22
7% 8.49 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.98 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 186 210 211 208 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 222
Write 222
Mixed 170
SusWrite 204
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 33.4
33% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HUS72403 3TB
27GB free
Firmware: A5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 84.7
Write 107
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 80.4
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
58GB free
Firmware: AA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 123 126 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 114
Mixed 67
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: AA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 142 146 143 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 152
Write 151
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 145
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
44GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 151 151 142 151 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 156
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 147
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS72403 3TB
40GB free
Firmware: A5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 91 89 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 150
Write 164
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 92.2
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS72403 3TB
29GB free
Firmware: A5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 83 81 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 80.2
Write 95.1
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 82.5
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS72403 3TB
18GB free
Firmware: A5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 129 129 134 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 79
Write 106
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 130
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8313 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-D3H-MVP Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback