Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 09:38
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 705
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 44.4
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 62
48% 59 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 42%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 290 287 282 284 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,380
Write 1,415
Mixed 1,171
SusWrite 324
292% 1,322 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 70.6
237% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,011
754% 997 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 233%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 115
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
144GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 37
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 65.1
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 156 159 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 113
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 156
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 113%
WDC WD40EFRX-68N 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 40
Write 39.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 42.3
52% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 65%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 30.2
Write 36.8
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 38.5
46% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 65%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
451GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 30.6
37% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback