| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080725 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 20:31 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.1%
Average
|
33% 48.1 Pts
|
15% 109 Pts
|
7% 110 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8408) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
|
1.93%
Terrible
|
2% 2.35 fps
|
2% 2.41 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 204 208 215 215 216 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
48% 214 MB/s
|
98% 34.3 MB/s
|
27% 44.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB
166GB free
Firmware: SC14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
45% 61 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Corsair Voyager 32GB
5GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.1 5 5.3 6.4 5.8 MB/s
|
5%
Terrible
|
8% 7.9 MB/s
|
17% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.3%
Very poor
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-EP35-DS4 Builds (Compare 38 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
| R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $149 |