TIMI TM1709

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemTIMI TM1709  (all builds)
MotherboardTIMI TM1709
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 21:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 584
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1D72 1709) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 7.28
6% 7.68 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 15.2
9% 9.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SSO512GTLC9-SBC-4 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 99 96 94 95 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 432
Write 396
Mixed 317
SusWrite 139
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 43.6
166% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 218
186% 270 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TM1709 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: TIMI TM1709

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback