Packard EasyNote LS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote LS11HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV70_HR
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '16 at 20:22
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 355 39% 308 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0514) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8537 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 389 (B1) Unknown 97 97 57 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 38 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 108 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25474182324
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 698GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 195 194 28322 (03) Spinup time 198 155 1066 (04) Start/Stop count 1 1 135483 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1780 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 205188 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 378 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 4347300 (C2) HDA temperature 118 83 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.2% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 93.2 Mixed 58 59% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 54%
Intenso Speed Line 125GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 103GB free, PID 1081 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 149 Write 100 Mixed 111 146% 120 MB/s	4K Read 7.11 4K Write 5.81 4K Mixed 2.74 317% 5.22 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG Kingston 9905428-043.A01G Kingston 9905428-043.A01G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote LS11HR Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS11HR

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	10x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	8x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	8x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	32x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	8x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	6x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 1x4GBMicronBench 24%, 2,440 samples	4x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	3x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16