ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3209AD6

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 3209AD6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 197 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 499 52% 416 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 36.8 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Chn25satas1 25 256GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 276 57 25 54 23 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 443 Write 389 Mixed 362 SusWrite 91.9 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 17 87% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 97 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 0.9 62% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 8,189 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC96 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 31 35 37 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 73.3 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 34.2 30% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3.5TB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	4.61% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 10 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 11.5 15% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V01D3LF8GB52852816 8001 R538G1609U1K 8001 R538G1609U1K 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback