Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130901
Uptime74.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 16:45
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 56
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 180
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 458
45% 370 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MB0500GCEHE 500GB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 36 29 29 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24% Poor
Read 53
Write 30.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 30.3
21% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 24%
Great: 79%
SABRENT 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 41 34 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 40
Mixed 37
SusWrite 37.2
29% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 669239-081 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback