Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Memory 39.5 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 28.6 31% 44.2 Pts	4-Core 36.1 8-Core 41.6 5% 38.8 Pts	64-Core 45.4 3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 679 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 668 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2395309239	40.8% Average	Read 233 Write 169 Mixed 144 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 16.9 62% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 61.9 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 51.6 38% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 0198 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.7 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM